Each candidate is evaluated on their actual records and our proprietary WATT Score framework.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (6 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
33.05 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
3.30/10
Based on 68 articles — limited coverage.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
29.64 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
2.96/10
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (5 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (5 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (5 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
34.26 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
3.43/10
Insufficient news coverage to produce a statistically reliable WATT score (17 articles). Interpret this candidate's score with caution.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (6 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (10 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (6 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (6 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (2 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (11 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
18.93 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
1.89/10
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
Insufficient news coverage (2 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
— WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
—/10
No longer in this race — the state's Wikipedia race page lists this candidate as one who withdrew from the race. Their coverage and scores are kept exactly as collected, but are not ranked against candidates still running.
Insufficient news coverage (5 articles) to produce a statistically reliable WATT score. Score suppressed from rankings.
No U.S. Senate record found: predictive ‘e’ score calculated via ideological proxy.
Unclustered
Media impression
38.23 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
3.82/10
Measured ‘e’ score: computed from this candidate's federal record — sponsored legislation, committee roles, and tenure — weighted by your selected priorities. Hard data only; no media sentiment.
Unclustered
Media impression
45.93 WATT
Effectiveness (‘e’)
4.59/10
No longer in this race — the state's Wikipedia race page lists this candidate as one who declined to run. Their coverage and scores are kept exactly as collected, but are not ranked against candidates still running.
Measured ‘e’ score: computed from this candidate's federal record — sponsored legislation, committee roles, and tenure — weighted by your selected priorities. Hard data only; no media sentiment.