Live dataMichigan · 2026 U.S. Senate

Know the problem. Know the candidates. Then vote.

Non-partisan data for Michigan, drawn from public records and thousands of news stories.

Public databases
12
Behind 20 measured problems
News stories on problems
957
Read and scored one by one
News stories on candidates
2,940
Checked against their public record

The 5 biggest problems in Michigan

Measured from public government data. Not from opinions or headlines.

  1. 1Grid Reliability

    Among the 3 worst states.

    Critical81/100
  2. 2Job Availability

    Worse here than in 42 other states.

    Critical68/100
  3. 3Climate Vulnerability

    Worse here than in 39 other states.

    Critical67/100
  4. 4Crime & Safety

    Worse here than in 41 other states.

    Moderate63/100
  5. 5Food Insecurity

    Worse here than in 36 other states.

    Moderate59/100
See all 20 problems →

Where the news gets Michigan wrong

We compare what the data says with what the news covers.

  • Political PolarizationOver-covered

    The news talks about political polarization in Michigan far more than the data says it is a problem here.

  • Energy CostsUnder-covered

    The data says energy costs is a bigger problem in Michigan than the news coverage suggests.

  • Education QualityUnder-covered

    The data says education quality is a bigger problem in Michigan than the news coverage suggests.

See every problem compared →

Who is running in Michigan

Ranked by Leadership Score — how news coverage describes their leadership. 100 is the best score any leader in U.S. history would earn.

  1. Abdul El-Sayed
    DemocratParty nominee

    49

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  2. Michael J Rogers
    RepublicanParty nominee

    12

    Leadership Score (WATT)

Detail breakdown
MeasureAbdul El-SayedMichael J Rogers
Leadership Score48.8 / 10012.3 / 100
Credit for strengths in the news+80.9+43.5
Deduction for criticism in the news−32.2−31.1
News stories analysed744697
Record ScoreNo voting record — has not served in Congress4.0 / 10

Look at the details

Everything above, with the numbers behind it.

Longer bar means bigger problem

Ranked by government data alone, ignoring headlines and politics. 0 means the problem does not exist. 100 means it is as bad as it gets. The dotted line is the average across all 50 states.

1. Grid Reliability
81 (Critical)Worse than average
2. Job Availability
68 (Critical)Worse than average
3. Climate Vulnerability
67 (Critical)Worse than average
4. Crime & Safety
63 (Moderate)Worse than average
5. Food Insecurity
59 (Moderate)Worse than average
6. Education Quality
56 (Moderate)Worse than average
7. Housing Affordability
54 (Moderate)Worse than average
8. Corporate Influence in Politics
52 (Moderate)Worse than average
9. Energy Costs
51 (Moderate)Worse than average
10. AI Displacement Risk
50 (Moderate)Worse than average