Live dataMinnesota · 2026 U.S. Senate

Know the problem. Know the candidates. Then vote.

Non-partisan data for Minnesota, drawn from public records and thousands of news stories.

Public databases
12
Behind 20 measured problems
News stories on problems
957
Read and scored one by one
News stories on candidates
2,842
Checked against their public record

The 5 biggest problems in Minnesota

Measured from public government data. Not from opinions or headlines.

  1. 1Climate Vulnerability

    Worse here than in 37 other states.

    Moderate64/100
  2. 2Job Availability

    Worse here than in 30 other states.

    Moderate57/100
  3. 3Political Polarization

    Worse here than in 26 other states.

    Moderate55/100
  4. 4Cost of Living & Inflation

    Worse here than in 29 other states.

    Moderate54/100
  5. 5AI Displacement Risk

    Worse here than in 27 other states.

    Moderate51/100
See all 20 problems →

Where the news gets Minnesota wrong

We compare what the data says with what the news covers.

  • Grid ReliabilityUnder-covered

    The data says grid reliability is a bigger problem in Minnesota than the news coverage suggests.

  • Healthcare AccessOver-covered

    The news talks about healthcare access in Minnesota far more than the data says it is a problem here.

  • AI Displacement RiskUnder-covered

    The data says ai displacement risk is a bigger problem in Minnesota than the news coverage suggests.

See every problem compared →

Who is running in Minnesota

Ranked by Leadership Score — how news coverage describes their leadership. 100 is the best score any leader in U.S. history would earn.

  1. Margaret "Peggy" Flanagan
    DemocratParty nominee

    43

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  2. Michele Tafoya
    RepublicanParty nominee

    31

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  3. Not enough news coverage to score yet

  4. Rebecca Whiting
    Libertarian

    Not enough news coverage to score yet

Detail breakdown
MeasureMargaret "Peggy" FlanaganMichele TafoyaMarisa SimonettiRebecca Whiting
Leadership Score43.3 / 10030.8 / 100——
Credit for strengths in the news+71.0+60.3——
Deduction for criticism in the news−27.7−29.5——
News stories analysed69245830
Record ScoreNo voting record — has not served in CongressNo voting record — has not served in CongressNo voting record — has not served in CongressNo voting record — has not served in Congress

Look at the details

Everything above, with the numbers behind it.

Longer bar means bigger problem

Ranked by government data alone, ignoring headlines and politics. 0 means the problem does not exist. 100 means it is as bad as it gets. The dotted line is the average across all 50 states.

1. Climate Vulnerability
64 (Moderate)Worse than average
2. Job Availability
57 (Moderate)Worse than average
3. Political Polarization
55 (Moderate)Worse than average
4. Cost of Living & Inflation
54 (Moderate)Worse than average
5. AI Displacement Risk
51 (Moderate)Worse than average
6. Corporate Influence in Politics
51 (Moderate)Worse than average
7. Housing Affordability
46 (Lower)Better than average
8. Energy Costs
46 (Lower)Better than average
9. Pollution & Public Health
46 (Lower)Better than average
10. Transportation & Traffic
44 (Lower)Better than average