Non-partisan data for Nebraska, drawn from public records and hundreds of news stories.
Measured from public government data. Not from opinions or headlines.
Worse here than in 44 other states.
Worse here than in 36 other states.
Worse here than in 42 other states.
Worse here than in 35 other states.
Worse here than in 24 other states.
We compare what the data says with what the news covers.
The news talks about mental health & addiction crisis in Nebraska far more than the data says it is a problem here.
The data says ai displacement risk is a bigger problem in Nebraska than the news coverage suggests.
The data says corporate influence in politics is a bigger problem in Nebraska than the news coverage suggests.
Ranked by Leadership Score — how news coverage describes their leadership. 100 is the best score any leader in U.S. history would earn.
37
Leadership Score (WATT)
27
Leadership Score (WATT)
0
Leadership Score (WATT)
| Measure | Dan Osborn | Pete Ricketts | Mike Marvin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leadership Score | 36.9 / 100 | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 / 100 |
| Credit for strengths in the news | +67.0 | +56.8 | +3.0 |
| Deduction for criticism in the news | −30.1 | −29.7 | −9.9 |
| News stories analysed | 272 | 550 | 35 |
| Record Score | No voting record — has not served in Congress | 5.4 / 10 | No voting record — has not served in Congress |
Everything above, with the numbers behind it.
Ranked by government data alone, ignoring headlines and politics. 0 means the problem does not exist. 100 means it is as bad as it gets. The dotted line is the average across all 50 states.