Live dataState analytics portal

The real problems facing Nebraska.

We parse public databases to measure issue severity, stripped of political spin. Below is the objective severity of community issues compared with active public narrative focus.

Open Crown Matcher →

Longer bar means bigger problem

Problems are ranked by objective severity (hard data) alone, ignoring media hype and political narratives. 0 means the problem does not exist (utopia). 100 means an absolute, catastrophic crisis.

1. Political Polarization
59.5 (Moderate)Gravity (0–100)+9.5 above national
2. Digital Divide
54.1 (Moderate)Gravity (0–100)+3.4 above national
3. Pollution & Public Health
52.4 (Moderate)Gravity (0–100)+2.2 above national
4. Education Quality
50.7 (Moderate)Gravity (0–100)+1.1 above national
5. AI Governance & Automation
50.0 (Moderate)Gravity (0–100)At national avg
6. Healthcare Access
49.4 (Okay)Gravity (0–100)0.8 below national
7. Corporate Influence in Politics
42.2 (Okay)Gravity (0–100)7.5 below national
8. Food Insecurity
40.3 (Okay)Gravity (0–100)7.9 below national
9. Climate Vulnerability
39.5 (Okay)Gravity (0–100)9.7 below national
10. Water Scarcity
39.5 (Okay)Gravity (0–100)10.2 below national

Comprehensive severity ledger

Detailed breakdown of the raw data, media sentiment, and delta calculations driving the charts above.

Emerging Frictions

Digital Divide
Insufficient coverage
Objective reality (Gravity)54.1/100
Media focus
Insufficient media coverage for this problem in this state (2 articles). No reliable sentiment score.
National average
50.7/ 100
+3.4 above national
Gravity54.1
Sentiment
AI Governance & Automation
· Δ 17.1
Objective reality (Gravity)50.0/100
Media focus32.9/100
There is a modest gap on ai governance & automation between the hard data (50.0) and media coverage (32.9) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
50.0/ 100
At national avg
Gravity50.0
Sentiment32.9

Economic Reality

Food Insecurity
Δ 2.1
Objective reality (Gravity)40.3/100
Media focus38.2/100
Objective facts and media discussion are aligned on food insecurity (40.3 severity). What you read in the headlines matches reality.
National average
48.2/ 100
-7.9 below national
Gravity40.3
Sentiment38.2
Wage Stagnation & Income Inequality
Δ 32.0
Objective reality (Gravity)39.2/100
Media focus71.2/100
Media coverage is elevated about wage stagnation & income inequality (Media: 71.2), but hard public data reveals this is not as severe as media coverage suggests (Data: 39.2). The public perception is artificially inflated.
National average
49.0/ 100
-9.7 below national
Gravity39.2
Sentiment71.2
Energy Costs
Δ 23.0
Objective reality (Gravity)37.5/100
Media focus14.5/100
Nebraska is facing a significant gap on energy costs (Severity: 37.5), but local politicians and media are receiving limited media coverage (Media: 14.5). The narrative is sleeping on a major problem.
National average
49.9/ 100
-12.5 below national
Gravity37.5
Sentiment14.5
Cost of Living & Inflation
· Δ 18.7
Objective reality (Gravity)34.5/100
Media focus53.2/100
There is a modest gap on cost of living & inflation between the hard data (34.5) and media coverage (53.2) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
50.1/ 100
-15.6 below national
Gravity34.5
Sentiment53.2
Housing Affordability
Δ 23.6
Objective reality (Gravity)33.2/100
Media focus56.8/100
Media coverage is elevated about housing affordability (Media: 56.8), but hard public data reveals this is not as severe as media coverage suggests (Data: 33.2). The public perception is artificially inflated.
National average
49.7/ 100
-16.5 below national
Gravity33.2
Sentiment56.8
Job Availability
· Δ 17.3
Objective reality (Gravity)31.5/100
Media focus48.8/100
There is a modest gap on job availability between the hard data (31.5) and media coverage (48.8) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
49.8/ 100
-18.3 below national
Gravity31.5
Sentiment48.8

Social & Public Service Infrastructure

Education Quality
· Δ 12.9
Objective reality (Gravity)50.7/100
Media focus37.7/100
There is a modest gap on education quality between the hard data (50.7) and media coverage (37.7) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
49.6/ 100
+1.1 above national
Gravity50.7
Sentiment37.7
Healthcare Access
Δ 6.6
Objective reality (Gravity)49.4/100
Media focus55.9/100
Objective facts and media discussion are aligned on healthcare access (49.4 severity). What you read in the headlines matches reality.
National average
50.1/ 100
-0.8 below national
Gravity49.4
Sentiment55.9
Transportation & Traffic
Δ 1.0
Objective reality (Gravity)25.6/100
Media focus26.6/100
Objective facts and media discussion are aligned on transportation & traffic (25.6 severity). What you read in the headlines matches reality.
National average
48.5/ 100
-23.0 below national
Gravity25.6
Sentiment26.6
Mental Health & Addiction Crisis
Δ 48.0
Objective reality (Gravity)20.8/100
Media focus68.9/100
Media coverage is elevated about mental health & addiction crisis (Media: 68.9), but hard public data reveals this is not as severe as media coverage suggests (Data: 20.8). The public perception is artificially inflated.
National average
50.2/ 100
-29.4 below national
Gravity20.8
Sentiment68.9

Environmental & Resource Security

Pollution & Public Health
Δ 1.4
Objective reality (Gravity)52.4/100
Media focus53.9/100
Objective facts and media discussion are aligned on pollution & public health (52.4 severity). What you read in the headlines matches reality.
National average
50.2/ 100
+2.2 above national
Gravity52.4
Sentiment53.9
Climate Vulnerability
Δ 35.2
Objective reality (Gravity)39.5/100
Media focus74.7/100
Media coverage is elevated about climate vulnerability (Media: 74.7), but hard public data reveals this is not as severe as media coverage suggests (Data: 39.5). The public perception is artificially inflated.
National average
49.2/ 100
-9.7 below national
Gravity39.5
Sentiment74.7
Water Scarcity
· Δ 13.5
Objective reality (Gravity)39.5/100
Media focus53.0/100
There is a modest gap on water scarcity between the hard data (39.5) and media coverage (53.0) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
49.7/ 100
-10.2 below national
Gravity39.5
Sentiment53.0
Grid Reliability
Δ 28.6
Objective reality (Gravity)37.6/100
Media focus66.2/100
Media coverage is elevated about grid reliability (Media: 66.2), but hard public data reveals this is not as severe as media coverage suggests (Data: 37.6). The public perception is artificially inflated.
National average
49.9/ 100
-12.4 below national
Gravity37.6
Sentiment66.2

Systemic & Governance Frictions

Political Polarization
· Δ 15.0
Objective reality (Gravity)59.5/100
Media focus74.5/100
There is a modest gap on political polarization between the hard data (59.5) and media coverage (74.5) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
50.0/ 100
+9.5 above national
Gravity59.5
Sentiment74.5
Corporate Influence in Politics
Δ 0.6
Objective reality (Gravity)42.2/100
Media focus42.7/100
Objective facts and media discussion are aligned on corporate influence in politics (42.2 severity). What you read in the headlines matches reality.
National average
49.6/ 100
-7.5 below national
Gravity42.2
Sentiment42.7
Government Inefficiency
· Δ 9.9
Objective reality (Gravity)35.3/100
Media focus45.2/100
There is a modest gap on government inefficiency between the hard data (35.3) and media coverage (45.2) — worth watching, but not a significant divergence.
National average
49.5/ 100
-14.3 below national
Gravity35.3
Sentiment45.2