Live dataWyoming · 2026 U.S. Senate

Know the problem. Know the candidates. Then vote.

Non-partisan data for Wyoming, drawn from public records and hundreds of news stories.

Public databases
12
Behind 20 measured problems
News stories on problems
881
Read and scored one by one
News stories on candidates
388
Checked against their public record

The 5 biggest problems in Wyoming

Measured from public government data. Not from opinions or headlines.

  1. 1Digital Divide

    Among the 4 worst states.

    Critical82/100
  2. 2Healthcare Access

    Worse here than in 43 other states.

    Critical68/100
  3. 3Political Polarization

    Worse here than in 44 other states.

    Critical68/100
  4. 4Corporate Influence in Politics

    Among the 4 worst states.

    Critical66/100
  5. 5Education Quality

    Worse here than in 40 other states.

    Moderate62/100
See all 20 problems →

Where the news gets Wyoming wrong

We compare what the data says with what the news covers.

  • Climate VulnerabilityOver-covered

    The news talks about climate vulnerability in Wyoming far more than the data says it is a problem here.

  • Food InsecurityOver-covered

    The news talks about food insecurity in Wyoming far more than the data says it is a problem here.

  • Healthcare AccessUnder-covered

    The data says healthcare access is a bigger problem in Wyoming than the news coverage suggests.

See every problem compared →

Who is running in Wyoming

Ranked by Leadership Score — how news coverage describes their leadership. 100 is the best score any leader in U.S. history would earn.

  1. 40

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  2. Jimmy Skovgard
    Republican

    33

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  3. Samuel Mead
    Republican

    29

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  4. Harriet Hageman
    Republican

    24

    Leadership Score (WATT)

  5. Not enough news coverage to score yet

Detail breakdown
MeasureJames Willard ByrdJimmy SkovgardSamuel MeadHarriet HagemanBilly Benavidez
Leadership Score40.3 / 10033.1 / 10028.9 / 10024.4 / 100—
Credit for strengths in the news+41.4+33.1+29.3+43.7—
Deduction for criticism in the news−1.1−0.0−0.4−19.3—
News stories analysed2122181289
Record ScoreNo voting record — has not served in CongressNo voting record — has not served in CongressNo voting record — has not served in Congress5.3 / 10No voting record — has not served in Congress
See all 7 candidates →

Look at the details

Everything above, with the numbers behind it.

Longer bar means bigger problem

Ranked by government data alone, ignoring headlines and politics. 0 means the problem does not exist. 100 means it is as bad as it gets. The dotted line is the average across all 50 states.

1. Digital Divide
82 (Critical)Worse than average
2. Healthcare Access
68 (Critical)Worse than average
3. Political Polarization
68 (Critical)Worse than average
4. Corporate Influence in Politics
66 (Critical)Worse than average
5. Education Quality
62 (Moderate)Worse than average
6. Mental Health & Addiction Crisis
42 (Lower)Better than average
7. Water Scarcity
40 (Lower)Better than average
8. Cost of Living & Inflation
40 (Lower)Better than average
9. Pollution & Public Health
40 (Lower)Better than average
10. Grid Reliability
39 (Lower)Better than average